To: #PGE
Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E)
FBI – Bomb Squad Division
Other Relevant Authorities
Dear PG&E Review Board, FBI Bomb Squad, and All Relevant Authorities,
I submit this unified, detailed account of technical, mathematical, and investigative evidence regarding the recent fire incident at [location or equipment ID]. My objective is to show, with scientific rigor and best practices, that the incident resulted from system vulnerabilities and external electromagnetic effects—specifically uncovered electromagnetic pulse (EMP) and electromagnetic field (EMF) events—rather than any action or negligence on my part.
Additionally, there is credible evidence of a covert group operating within the legal system. This group uses layered language, multiple meanings, and contextual manipulation to obscure facts, derail investigations, and steer legal outcomes for personal gain. They exploit psychological techniques, digital evidence manipulation, and courtroom tactics to confuse juries, bias decisions, and distort the meaning and weight of evidence.
**EMP/EMF Layering Tactics:**
- Two uncovered EMP/EMF sources are initiated from different starting points.
- These signals converge at a third point, where they are layered together.
- This intense layering scrambles, distorts, or alters any messages, signals, or data—even those received by black boxes or critical evidence recorders.
- Uncovered (unshielded) pulses and fields spread widely, making detection and tracing extremely difficult.
- Layered signals at convergence points can manipulate perception, disrupt electronics, and corrupt recorded evidence.
- This enables coordinated frame-ups, evidence tampering, and undetected sabotage, especially when combined with system vulnerabilities like degraded wiring or missing covers.
**Summary of Evidence and Key Points**
**System Configuration Determines Outcome**
Physical wiring, maintenance, and configuration of electrical infrastructure directly affect how signals and energy are interpreted and responded to by the system. Any deviation from original design—such as aging equipment, missing covers, improper rewiring, or exposed conductors—can drastically alter the system's response to normal or abnormal events.
**EMP Effects on Power Systems**
EMPs induce high voltages in conductors, potentially overwhelming protection devices and damaging sensitive electronics. Even if correct signals are sent, EMPs can corrupt or destroy the information received by critical devices (e.g., fireboxes, black boxes).
**Fire Investigation Protocols and Documentation**
Proper fire investigation relies on thorough documentation, photographic and video evidence, floor plans, and written records, as outlined in national standards and best practices. Advanced forensic techniques—such as 3D scanning, thermal imaging, and chemical analysis—are crucial for accurately reconstructing the fire's origin and progression.
**Comparative Infrastructure Analysis**
The intersection of the PG&E grid with the San Andreas Fault, especially in zones with underground crossovers, increases the risk of simultaneous infrastructure and seismic failure.
**Technical Proof and Analogy**
Sudden shifts in wiring or configuration (distributed vs. centralized) can increase vulnerability to EMPs and other surges. The same input can yield drastically different outcomes if the system is compromised.
**Supporting Math, Tables, Visuals, and Maps**
A. **Mathematical Proof: EMP-Induced Voltage**
\[
V_{\text{induced}} = -L \frac{dI}{dt} + E_{\text{EMP}}
\]
Where:
- \(L\) = inductance of the conductor
- \(\frac{dI}{dt}\) = rate of change of current
- \(E_{\text{EMP}}\) = electric field strength of the EMP
Example:
If an EMP generates 50,000 V/m over a 100 m power line:
\[
V_{\text{induced}} = E_{\text{EMP}} \times \text{length} = 50,000 \times 100 = 5,000,000 \text{ V}
\]
B. **System Response Table**
| System State | Event (Input) | Output (Response) | Example Outcome |
|----------------------|--------------------|----------------------------|--------------------------|
| Properly Maintained | EMP, surge, wind | System withstands event | No fire, no damage |
| Degraded/Altered | EMP, surge, wind | Arcing, sparks, equipment fail | Possible fire, damage |
| Rewired/Exposed | EMP, surge | Unpredictable, unsafe outcome | Fire, misinterpreted signals |
C. **Information Pathway Diagram**
```
[EMP Pulse]
v
| Metal Frame/Firebox | <-- (Partial Faraday cage)
| ------------------- |
| | Battery Pack | | <-- (EMP-resistant)
| | (with wiring) | |
| ------------------- |
| | Black Box | | <-- (Sensitive electronics)
(Wiring, sensors)
Red arrows: EMP induces voltage in wiring.
Blue burst: Black box receives corrupted or no data.
```
D. **Order of Operations Analogy (PEMDAS)**
\[
(3+4)^2 \times 2a = e
\]
Proper order:
\[
a = \frac{e}{98}
\]
Altered order/configuration: Output can be incorrect or undefined, analogous to how system rewiring alters response to the same input.
E. **EMP Impact on Distributed vs. Centralized Systems**
```
[EMP Event]
/ \
/ \
[Distributed Lines] [Centralized Node]
/ | \ |
[Line1][Line2][Line3] [Main Transformer]
\ | / |
[Substations] [Load]
Red lightning bolts: EMP surges.
Orange bursts: Potential damage points.
```
F. **Compare and Contrast Map: PG&E Grid vs. San Andreas Fault (Underground Crossovers)**
| Location | Grid Type | Fault Segment | Crossover/Proximity |
|-----------------|--------------|---------------|-----------------------------|
| San Francisco | Underground | Northern | Near Daly City, Peninsula |
| Marin County | Underground | Northern | Bolinas, Tomales Bay |
| Hollister | Underground | Central | Direct crossing |
| Carrizo Plain | Transmission | Southern | Crosses visible fault |
Visual Concept Map:
```
[PG&E Grid] ---------+
| Underground Lines |<---(Bay Area, Peninsula, Marin, Hollister)
+--------------------+
[San Andreas Fault]
```
**Conclusion**
The incident in question was not the result of any action or negligence on my part, but the predictable outcome of system vulnerabilities and external electromagnetic effects beyond my control, compounded by possible legal system manipulation. Mathematical, physical, and forensic evidence demonstrates:
- System configuration and condition dictate response to EMP/EMF and other events.
- Uncovered, layered EMP/EMF attacks scramble messages and data at the point of convergence.
- Even advanced forensic devices (black boxes) can be deceived or rendered unreliable.
- Infrastructure intersections with seismic faults heighten risk.
- Industry precedent, law enforcement protocols, and technical analysis support this conclusion.
- A covert group's manipulation of legal context and language further undermines justice.
I respectfully request this evidence be considered in your review and that I be cleared of any wrongdoing. Immediate, multidisciplinary review and oversight are essential to expose and stop these tactics.
Please see attached diagrams, references, and documentation. I am available for further discussion or clarification.
Thank you for your attention.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
- NEW FIRE INVESTIGATION TECHNOLOGY AND TOOLS - Jensen Hughes
- A new accident analysis and investigation model for the complex - ScienceDirect
- Arson Investigation: Techniques, Evidence Collection, and Analysis - BlazeStack
- Fire Investigation Procedures: A Step-by-Step Guide - Fire Cash Buyer
- Advancing Fire Scene Investigations with Field Portable Technologies - ForensicCOE
- Fire Investigation - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
- Fire investigation handbook - NIST Technical Series Publications
and then here is for the water and this is what you'll use to create the story
Willem Schalk: (agent, FBI)
To: Department of Health
CC: Water Sanitation Division, Department of Water Resources
Subject: Urgent Concern: Overlooked Chemical and Biological Contaminants in Waterways at 3313 DeWitt Rd, Modesto, CA
Dear Department of Health, Water Sanitation, and Department of Water Resources,
I am writing to urgently report a complex and dangerous contamination issue at 3313 DeWitt Rd, Modesto. Water samples and credible reports indicate the presence of multiple hazardous substances-chemical and biological-whose combined risks are not only severe but also easily overlooked by standard water testing protocols.
Combined Chemical and Biological Hazards
Chemical Mixtures: The site is exposed to DMT, azo compounds, phenoxyethanol, and chlorine. When mixed, these substances can produce highly toxic byproducts like aromatic amines, trihalomethanes (THMs), and haloacetic acids (HAAs), all associated with cancer, neurological harm, and ecological disruption. Phenoxyethanol adds further risk, being toxic to aquatic life and potentially harmful to humans.
Legacy Industrial Contaminants: Drawing on lessons from the Rippon paper mill incident, legacy pollutants can interact with modern chemicals and chlorine, increasing the formation of persistent, bioaccumulative, and carcinogenic compounds.
Biological Threats: Toxoplasma gondii oocysts, shed in cat feces, can survive in water for months and are highly resistant to chlorine. Ingestion can cause severe illness, miscarriage, or neurological damage, especially in pregnant women, infants, and immunocompromised individuals.
Risks of Overlooked and Misread Contaminants
Most of these hazardous chemicals and biological agents are not routinely tested for in standard municipal water screenings. Typical protocols focus on a narrow list of regulated contaminants and basic parameters, missing:
Emerging chemicals like phenoxyethanol, DMT, and specific aromatic amines.
Advanced disinfection byproducts and legacy industrial pollutants.
Biological threats like Toxoplasma gondii.
These substances are easily overlooked or misread because:
Standard tests are not designed to detect them; they require advanced, targeted methods (e.g., GC-MS, PCR).
If not specifically requested, labs will not look for these contaminants, leading to false negatives.
Subtle contamination can be missed or misattributed without expert knowledge and specialized equipment.
Water samples only capture a snapshot in time, so intermittent or hidden contamination may go undetected.
In summary: Unless you know exactly what to look for and use the right advanced methods, these hazardous contaminants can be easily missed, giving a false sense of security.
Recommendations
Comprehensive, targeted testing for DMT, azo compounds, phenoxyethanol, chlorinated byproducts, Toxoplasma gondii, and related toxins.
Update water safety protocols to include advanced screening for both chemical and biological hazards.
Investigate sources of contamination, including industrial, agricultural, and biological contributors.
Transparent communication with the community about risks and remediation efforts.
The combination of these overlooked contaminants represents a serious and urgent threat to public health and the environment. I urge immediate, decisive action to prevent a crisis similar to those seen in other communities affected by waterborne toxins and pathogens.
Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter.
Key Contacts:
Department of Health: Contact
Water Sanitation Division: Contact
Department of Water Resources: Contact