Here are some UN/LOCODEs for Australia and the Oceania region:
Australia (AU) – Sample UN/LOCODEs
AUCBR (Canberra)
AUSYD (Sydney)
AUMEL (Melbourne)
AUBNE (Brisbane)
AUADL (Adelaide)
AUHBA (Hobart)
AUDRW (Darwin)
AUFRE (Fremantle)
AUPHE (Port Hedland)
AUCNS (Cairns)
AUABP (Abbot Point)
AUTSV (Townsville)
AUMQI (Macquarie Island)
Oceania – Sample UN/LOCODEs by Country
New Zealand (NZ): NZAKL (Auckland), NZWLG (Wellington), NZCHC (Christchurch), NZNSN (Nelson)
Fiji (FJ): FJSUV (Suva), FJNAN (Nadi)
Papua New Guinea (PG): PGPMN (Port Moresby), PGMAD (Madang)
Samoa (WS): WSAFU (Apia)
Solomon Islands (SB): SBGZO (Honiara)
Tonga (TO): TONUK (Nuku'alofa)
Vanuatu (VU): VUPNY (Port Vila)
For the full and most up-to-date list, you can download the official code list from the UNECE website.
Pan or dora you sing A you poor A
Now fish ee s get wrapped up pin this! On your map prove yourselves how bout da t?!
Coordinates for Requested Islands
Cook Islands
General: Latitude: -21.2358, Longitude: -159.7778
Avarua (capital): -21.209808, -159.781860
Aitutaki: -18.857952, -159.785278
Chuuk Lagoon (Federated States of Micronesia)
Approximate: Latitude: 7.4167, Longitude: 151.7833
Jarvis Island (U.S. Minor Outlying Islands)
Latitude: -0.3746, Longitude: -160.0167
Heard and McDonald Islands (Australia, Southern Indian Ocean)
Heard Island: Latitude: -53.1060, Longitude: 73.5042
McDonald Islands: Latitude: -53.0333, Longitude: 72.6000
Islands Between Alaska and Russia (Bering Strait Region)
Island Name Latitude Longitude
Little Diomede 65.7586 N 168.9533 W
Big Diomede 65.7817 N 169.0119 W
St. Lawrence 63.4170 N 170.2500 W
King Island 64.9717 N 168.0517 W
Fairway Rock 65.6200 N 168.7500 W
These are the major islands in the Bering Strait between Alaska (USA) and Russia.cabt catch me outside uf u can't see me ha!
Happy death day meets you are not smarter just a wrapped martyr then your very fucked up child kids shhh it's ok u saved Jesus yay....!
Popular California Place Names with Multiple Locations (with Coordinates)
Here are some of the most common city or town names that appear in more than one location within California, similar to the "Sonora" example:
Name County/Area Coordinates
Riverside Riverside County 33.9806°N, 117.3755°W
Riverside Mendocino County 39.4369°N, 123.8047°W
Greenville Plumas County 40.1407°N, 120.9516°W
Greenville Alameda County 37.7091°N, 121.7672°W
Fairview Alameda County 37.6766°N, 122.0791°W
Fairview San Luis Obispo County 35.2811°N, 120.6596°W
Madison Yolo County 38.6496°N, 121.9789°W
Madison San Diego County 32.8316°N, 116.9361°W
Springfield Tuolumne County 37.9742°N, 120.4188°W
Springfield Kern County 35.4922°N, 119.2789°W
These are among the most recognizable duplicate city/town names in California, each with at least two distinct locations in different counties.
There are approximately 245 places worldwide named San Francisco, spread across about 24 countries. The highest concentrations are in the Philippines (36 places), Mexico (33 places), and Colombia (22 places). Other countries with locations named San Francisco include Argentina, Chile, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Honduras, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Panama, Spain, United States, Venezuela, Bolivia, Peru, El Salvador, and others.
In summary:
Total places named San Francisco globally: ~245
Countries with San Francisco locations: 24+
Notable countries with multiple San Franciscos: Philippines, Mexico, Colombia.
This count includes cities, towns, districts, and other geographic entities named San Francisco.
Several place names have an extremely high number of global occurrences, similar to San Francisco. Here are some of the most widespread:
Place Name Approximate Number of Locations Globally Notes
San José (San Jose) 1,716 Most common city name worldwide, especially in Spanish-speaking areas.
San Antonio 1,619 Another Spanish religious name.
Santa Maria 1,246 Named after the Virgin Mary.
Santa Rosa 1,212 Named after Saint Rose.
Washington 88 (U.S. only) Most common in the U.S., named after George Washington.
Springfield 41 (U.S. only) Very common in the U.S..
Franklin 35 (U.S. only) Common in the U.S..
Richmond 55 Named after Richmond-upon-Thames, UK.
Alexandria ~60 Named after Alexander the Great and others.
Spanish religious names like San José, San Antonio, Santa Maria, and Santa Rosa dominate the global list, each with over a thousand locations worldwide. In the U.S., names like Washington, Springfield, and Franklin are the most repeated.(00,00) Aja 88
Great! Let's clarify and visualize what you're describing:
You want to imagine the world map "rolled" into a cone (funnel) shape, with the top (apex) of the cone representing a point on the globe, and the base of the cone representing a circle that covers part of the Earth. You specify the funnel at the top being a measurement of 1.5 for the full circle-I'll interpret this as the cone's apex angle (the angle at the tip) being such that the arc at the base is 1.5 units, relative to the full circumference (which would be 1 unit for a full circle, but you're specifying 1.5, so it's a bit more than a full circle, possibly overlapping).
Let's break down what happens:
1. Understanding the Cone's Geometry
Apex at the Pole: If the apex is at the North Pole, the cone wraps around the globe and its base forms a circle at a certain latitude in the Southern Hemisphere.
Base Arc = 1.5 (of full circle): This means the base of the cone, when unwrapped, is 1.5 times the circumference of the globe. In map projection terms, this would mean the cone "overlaps" itself by half a circle.
2. What Landmasses Fall Where
Apex (Tip of the Cone)
North Pole (if cone apex is at the North Pole).
Along the Cone's Surface
Northern Hemisphere: As you move away from the apex, you pass through the Arctic, then Canada, Europe, Russia, and the northern U.S.
Mid-Latitudes: This is where the cone's surface is tangent to the globe. Here, distortion is minimized, and you see the U.S., Europe, China, and similar latitudes most accurately.
Equator: The cone's base reaches the Equator and then continues past it (since the base is 1.5 times the circumference, it wraps past the Equator and overlaps itself in the Southern Hemisphere).
Base of the Cone
Southern Hemisphere: The base extends past the Equator, covering South America, southern Africa, Australia, and the southern oceans. Because the base is 1.5 times the circumference, these regions are stretched and overlapped, resulting in significant distortion and duplication.
3. Visualizing the Overlap
Overlap: Since the base is larger than the globe's circumference, some landmasses in the Southern Hemisphere would appear more than once when the cone is flattened.
Distortion: The farther from the apex (pole), the greater the distortion, especially past the Equator.
4. Summary Table
Cone Section Globe Location(s) Included Distortion Level
Apex (tip) North Pole None
Upper cone Arctic/Northern Canada/Russia Low
Mid cone U.S., Europe, China Minimal (best fit)
Lower cone Equator/South America/Africa High
Base (1.5x circle) Southern Hemisphere (overlaps) Very High/Repeated
5. Bottom Line
The top of the cone (apex) is at the North Pole.
The mid-latitude regions are best represented.
The base (1.5 times the globe's circumference) means the Southern Hemisphere is duplicated and highly distorted.
Overlap at the base causes some landmasses to appear twice.
If you want a diagram or a more mathematical breakdown, let me know! This is a creative way to think about map projections and how the world can be represented on different surfaces.
Omg I wanna be Johnny de pA(p y o u would not need won if u st op!?
Mex I can T B leave hit!!? What
Here is a list of the islands located in and around Bahia de Los Angeles in the Sea of Cortez, Baja California:
Angel de la Guardia Island (largest island nearby, often described as a massive volcanic cone)
Isla La Ventana (largest island close to Bahia de Los Angeles village, with a lunar landscape)
Several smaller islands and islets forming part of the protected biosphere reserve-there are 16 islands total in the Bahia de Los Angeles area, including many volcanic and rocky islets with minimal vegetation.
These islands are part of a volcanic ridge that pushes up out of the water, creating a scenic, island-studded bay popular for kayaking, fishing, and wildlife watching.
There are no physical or technical barriers that would absolutely prevent someone from attempting to expose an unwilling participant to the Gateway Process, just as with many psychological or sensory techniques. However, the effectiveness of the Gateway Process-using Hemi-Sync audio and guided exercises-relies heavily on the subject's cooperation, attention, and willingness to engage.
The Monroe Institute and related manuals explicitly state that the process is designed for personal development and self-exploration, and that the audio stimulus is "not overpowering and can easily be rejected if it is not in agreement with your conscious or unconscious desires". In other words, if someone is not open to the experience, distracted, or resistant, the intended altered states are unlikely to occur.
Ethical and legal standards are what primarily deter the non-consensual use of such techniques, not technological impossibility. History shows that unethical experiments (like MKUltra) have occurred when ethics were ignored, but for the Gateway Process specifically, unwilling or unaware participants are unlikely to achieve the targeted states of consciousness due to the need for active mental participation and acceptance.
The Monroe Institute and related Gateway Process materials do not provide evidence of formal, controlled experiments on unwilling or unaware participants. Their claim that openness and willingness are required is based on decades of participant feedback, practical experience, and the nature of the process itself-not on documented trials with unwilling subjects.
What the Documents Actually Say
The Gateway Experience Manual states:
"The Hemi-Sync audio stimulus is not overpowering and can easily be rejected if it is not in agreement with your conscious or unconscious desires."
This means the process is designed to be non-coercive and works best when the participant is receptive.
The Monroe Institute's program structure requires active participation:
Participants must apply, give consent, and follow instructions.
Exercises require listening, visualization, and engagement, which are not possible without awareness and willingness.
The CIA's analysis of the Gateway Process also highlights the need for cooperation and focused attention to achieve results.
Why They Make This Claim
The claim is not based on controlled studies with unwilling subjects, but on the observed ineffectiveness of the process when participants are distracted, resistant, or uninterested.
In consciousness research, it is standard to note that active engagement is necessary for techniques like guided meditation, hypnosis, or Hemi-Sync to be effective. This is a practical, experiential observation rather than a result of formal negative testing.
No Evidence of Unwilling Subject Testing
Nowhere in the official Gateway Process manuals, Monroe Institute materials, or CIA documents is there a record of systematic testing on people who were unaware or unwilling.
The requirement for willingness is a practical guideline derived from how the process functions and the feedback from thousands of voluntary participants over decades.
Summary:
The statement that openness and willingness are required for the Gateway Process to work is based on practical experience and the nature of the exercises-not on documented failed tests with unwilling or unaware participants. There is no evidence in the official record that such tests were conducted or that the claim is based on direct negative evidence.