"In this regard, our court believes that although the original court's handling approach is well-intentioned, aiming to foster a technology license and avoid resource wastage."
"However, considering the obvious subjective fault and relatively serious infringement circumstances of the accused infringers such as Dajin Company in this case, this handling approach restricts the right holder's exercise of its intellectual property rights."
"On the other hand, if both parties cannot reach an agreement, it will lead to a stalemate in judgment enforcement and possibly trigger new disputes and litigation, failing to effectively protect Tengfei Company's intellectual property and, to some extent, increasing the cost of dispute resolution for both parties..."
The Supreme Court means that the original judgment is merely a good idea; if both parties cannot reach an agreement, this won't solve the problem at all and will instead increase future rights protection costs.
